Which of the following risk assessment outputs is most suitable to help justify an organizational information security program?

Which of the following risk assessment outputs is most suitable to help justify an organizational information security program?

• A. An inventory of risk that may impact the enterprise
• B. Documented threats to the enterprise
• C. Evaluation of the consequences
• D. A list of appropriate controls for addressing risk

Answer: (D)

The selection of a list of appropriate controls for addressing risk as the most suitable output to justify an organizational information security program is insightful. This is because demonstrating how specific controls can effectively mitigate identified risks provides a clear connection between risk assessment findings and the organization’s security strategy. Having a list of controls highlights the proactive steps that an organization intends to take in response to identified risks. It helps stakeholders understand what measures are being put in place to safeguard sensitive information and protect against potential threats. When presenting to management or other stakeholders, having concrete controls outlined emphasizes a structured and systematic approach to risk management, ultimately aligning with the organization’s strategic goals. By showcasing these controls, an organization is also better positioned to allocate resources effectively, establish budgetary requirements, and prioritize security initiatives—important factors when justifying the need for an information security program. This approach also facilitates communication and supports decision-making processes regarding investment in necessary security measures and technologies. The other options, while relevant to risk assessment, are not as directly impactful when it comes to justifying the overarching security program. An inventory of risk provides a comprehensive overview but lacks the specific actionable steps necessary for implementation. Documented threats contextualize the environment but do not directly address how the organization will respond. An evaluation of

The selection of a list of appropriate controls for addressing risk as the most suitable output to justify an organizational information security program is insightful. This is because demonstrating how specific controls can effectively mitigate identified risks provides a clear connection between risk assessment findings and the organization’s security strategy.

Having a list of controls highlights the proactive steps that an organization intends to take in response to identified risks. It helps stakeholders understand what measures are being put in place to safeguard sensitive information and protect against potential threats. When presenting to management or other stakeholders, having concrete controls outlined emphasizes a structured and systematic approach to risk management, ultimately aligning with the organization’s strategic goals.

By showcasing these controls, an organization is also better positioned to allocate resources effectively, establish budgetary requirements, and prioritize security initiatives—important factors when justifying the need for an information security program. This approach also facilitates communication and supports decision-making processes regarding investment in necessary security measures and technologies.

The other options, while relevant to risk assessment, are not as directly impactful when it comes to justifying the overarching security program. An inventory of risk provides a comprehensive overview but lacks the specific actionable steps necessary for implementation. Documented threats contextualize the environment but do not directly address how the organization will respond. An evaluation of