What should be the primary basis for selecting security technologies?

What should be the primary basis for selecting security technologies?

• A. Evaluation in security publications
• B. Compliance with industry standards
• C. Ability to mitigate risk to organizational objectives
• D. Cost compared to the enterprise's IT budget

Answer: (C)

The primary basis for selecting security technologies should focus on their ability to mitigate risk to organizational objectives. This approach emphasizes the importance of aligning security measures with the specific goals and risk appetite of the organization. By prioritizing risk mitigation, organizations can ensure that the technologies they adopt directly contribute to enhancing their security posture and protecting critical assets and information. When security technologies are selected based on their effectiveness in addressing known risks and vulnerabilities, as opposed to arbitrary metrics such as cost or industry standards, they are more likely to provide meaningful protection against actual threats that could impact the organization’s operations and objectives. Focusing on the organization's risk landscape allows for strategic investment in security technologies that support broader business goals while fostering a proactive risk management culture. Furthermore, while evaluations in security publications, compliance with industry standards, and budget constraints can play a role in the decision-making process, they should not be the primary drivers. These factors are often secondary and should complement a more thorough risk assessment process to ensure that security investments yield the highest return regarding risk reduction and protection of organizational interests.

The primary basis for selecting security technologies should focus on their ability to mitigate risk to organizational objectives. This approach emphasizes the importance of aligning security measures with the specific goals and risk appetite of the organization. By prioritizing risk mitigation, organizations can ensure that the technologies they adopt directly contribute to enhancing their security posture and protecting critical assets and information.

When security technologies are selected based on their effectiveness in addressing known risks and vulnerabilities, as opposed to arbitrary metrics such as cost or industry standards, they are more likely to provide meaningful protection against actual threats that could impact the organization’s operations and objectives. Focusing on the organization's risk landscape allows for strategic investment in security technologies that support broader business goals while fostering a proactive risk management culture.

Furthermore, while evaluations in security publications, compliance with industry standards, and budget constraints can play a role in the decision-making process, they should not be the primary drivers. These factors are often secondary and should complement a more thorough risk assessment process to ensure that security investments yield the highest return regarding risk reduction and protection of organizational interests.